Continuing with Gary’s list:
- The squirrel’s nest was hidden by drooping boughs.
OK. No squirrels. We’ll use kyÉ¨lan, which is a largish sort of insect that build nests, sometimes even in trees.
If I were to say that the kyÉ¨lan‘s nest is hidden, I’d use a verb of stance. The addition of the by phrase makes the drooping boughs a cause. So I could say that the boughs “sent” the nest to hiding. Or I could stick with the verb of stance and say that the nest sat in hiding in the boughs. I think that “by” means I should use the equivalent of “sent”, which would involve tÉ¨ŋi.
The next question is whether to mark the source (the boughs) with tto. I state in my published grammar that the causative tto attaches itself only to motile sources. The branches aren’t actually motile, but leaving them sessile turns them into a point of origin or a purpose. So I think I will have to allow tto to attach to any source and turn it from a purpose to a cause.
66. nÉ¨di nubitto kyÉ¨lan ha lomu tÉ¨ŋi lammo dÉ›stÉ›.
- I’m told
66. ñi jalōmme jē jacīla jalāma tō janīri janūwi;